Home page > Act > Before International Forums > FIACAT at the UN > FIACAT and the Human Rights Council > FIACAT in the HRC’s review process > NGO Proposal on the Structure for the 2011 Review of the Human Rights (...)

NGO Proposal on the Structure for the 2011 Review of the Human Rights Council’s Work and Functioning

May 2010

[English] [français]

NGO Proposal on the Structure for the 2011 Review of the Human Rights Council’s Work and Functioning

Amnesty International, Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM‐ASIA), Asian Legal Resource Centre, Association for the Prevention of Torture, Baha’i International Community, Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies, Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, Child Rights Information Network (CRIN), FIACAT, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, Democracy Coalition Project, Human Rights Council of Australia, Human Rights Watch, International Commission of Jurists, International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), International Service for Human Rights , Lutheran World Federation, NGO Group for the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

6 May 2010

Introduction

As the Human Rights Council begins discussions on the format and modalities for the review of its work and functioning as required by General Assembly Resolution 60/251, we would like to make some proposals for the review process.

The proposals are based on the emerging consensus among States that renegotiating the Council’s institutional framework (Resolution 5/1 and Resolution 5/2) should not be the basis of the review process. The review process should only supplement this framework where necessary to ensure that the Council fulfils its mandate to ‘promote universal respect for the protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction and in a fair and equal manner’ (operative paragraph 2 of Resolution 60/251).

The institutional framework was adopted by the Council, at the end of the arduous institution‐building year, by consensus. It is a finely balanced framework that was agreed as a package. Similarly, the outcome of the review process should be achieved through consensus. Our proposals are firmly rooted in the mandate and responsibilities given to the Council by the General Assembly. We believe that the Council’s ‘work and functioning’ should be reviewed against this mandate as it sets the standard for what is expected of the Council.

The review process should focus on the identification of good practices and challenges with a view to making concrete proposals to improve the Council’s work and functioning. The format for the review proposed below will ensure that the identification of good practices and challenges takes place against clear and established benchmarks, and not in a vacuum.

- Read the NGO proposal


About us
Our team
ACAT Network
Statutes
Finances
Understand
Torture
The death Penalty
Enforced Disappearances
International Criminal Justice
International organizations
Position of Churches
Timeline
Table of Ratification by country
Act
Before International Forums
With Coalitions
Representation before the Churches
Training sessions
How to get involved?
Get informed
Annual reports
Reports
"FIACAT.News" liaison bulletin
Resources
Theological ressources
Links
Media

Contact Links
FIACAT - 27, rue de Maubeuge - 75009 Paris — France - TÚl.: +33 (0)1 42 80 01 60 -