[HRC 16] : Oral statement on UPR

March 2011

[English] [français]

General Debate
Friday 18 March 2011

Mr. President,

On the 24th of February, the Human Rights Council completed the Review of its Work and Functioning and we welcome your efforts to lead this process. All stakeholders invested a significant amount of energy and resources towards a review that suggested promising results and created high expectations from civil society around the world. Unfortunately, closer to its end, the process was diluted to a mere ‘fine-tuning’ exercise as opposed to a thorough Review. The adopted Outcome of the Review and Functioning of the UN Human Rights Council did not introduce major improvements in any area, including the Universal Periodic Review. Many proposals made by various stakeholders that were specifically aimed at strengthening the UPR were dropped over the course of the Review.

Mr. President,

37 NGOs from Geneva and around the world came together last October to put forward proposals to improve the UPR process. This Joint NGO Contribution was submitted to the first session of the Openended intergovernmental working group in October 2010 and contained seven key issues upon which actions needed to be taken to strengthen the UPR. Although some proposals contained in this Contribution were supported, others - very strong ones – were disregarded. Hence, no guarantee was developed in the Outcome to ensure well-prepared, inclusive and meaningful national consultations. UN compilation and stakeholders’ summary will not be introduced during the UPR working group, and will consequently not be given the same importance as the National report. Moreover, the Outcome fails in requiring recommendations to be specific and action-oriented in order to guarantee a meaningful implementation. In regards to the follow-up, although the Outcome makes provisions for consultations with stakeholders, it does not contain any mechanism or modality to assess such a follow-up. Finally, non-ECOSOC NGOs will continue to be excluded from the adoption process despite their full participation in submitting information.

Mr. President,

We believe that the UPR process has a much greater potential than reflected in the present Outcome of the Review. It is now the role of the Human Rights Council and States to make best use of the Outcome and improve the mechanism by doing.
We therefore call on all States and the Council to continue, through the second cycle, working on strengthening the UPR in order to ensure transparent and meaningful national consultations, improved opportunities for civil society and thorough assessments of implementation of UPR recommendations.

I thank you, Mr. President.

About us
Our team
ACAT Network
The death Penalty
Enforced Disappearances
International Criminal Justice
International organizations
Position of Churches
Before International Forums
With Coalitions
Representation before the Churches
Training sessions
How to get involved?
Get informed
Annual reports
Theological ressources

Contact Links
FIACAT - 27, rue de Maubeuge - 75009 Paris — France - TÚl.: +33 (0)1 42 80 01 60 -